RE: [ISSUE-34] Localization Quality from Yves Savourel on 2012-08-21 (public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org from August 2012)

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:23:51 -0600
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: <philr@vistatec.ie>, <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <assp.0580e4d70c.assp.0580118928.001701cd7fa8$96187170$c2495450$@com>

> Just  a question: would that resolve the standoff issue-37,
> or are there needs for other types of standoff notation?

Yes, I believe the proposed notation should resolve issue 37.

One of the examples is actually XLIFF 2.0 except for its root (I didn’t want to put a still-draft version in the specification. But it works the same).

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/LocQuality#Example_of_local_standoff_markup_with_a_global_rule_in_XML

cheers,
-yves

Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:24:18 UTC