2012/8/2 Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de> > Good question. I realized I don't actually know the answer to that. I > thought Felix meant that they didn't want us to use any prefix at all > No ... they are OK with the "its-" prefix. See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-multilingualweb-lt/2012Aug/0000.html it talkes about its- attributes. Best, Felix > , but if that is not the case, I would like to use one to keep the scope > clearer. > > Best, > > Arle > > > On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:33 , Des Oates <doates@adobe.com> wrote: > > Hi Arle**** > > Just one point of clarification on this:**** > >Before I move on, if we really move into the HTML5 world (per Felix's > mail), we can no longer call these things like "its:qualityscore"**** > > I interpreted Felix’ Email regarding HTML WG to mean that we require any > attributes we define to be ratified by that group. Not that we cannot use > the ‘its-‘ prefix. As you illustrate with your suggestions, not having a > ‘namespace’ prefix like ‘its-‘ would require attribute names to take the > form of cryptic conflated abbreviations which would definitely impact the > t the readability of attributes and thus, I imagine, generate some push > back from the HTML folks.**** > > Perhaps you or Felix could clarify.**** > > Thanks**** > Des**** > **** > > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C FellowReceived on Thursday, 2 August 2012 10:53:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:50 UTC