Re: ISSUE 34: Proposal for quality attributes

Good question. I realized I don't actually know the answer to that. I thought Felix meant that they didn't want us to use any prefix at all, but if that is not the case, I would like to use one to keep the scope clearer.

Best,

Arle

On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:33 , Des Oates <doates@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi Arle
>  
> Just one point of clarification on this:
> >Before I move on, if we really move into the HTML5 world (per Felix's mail), we can no longer call these things like "its:qualityscore"
>  
> I interpreted Felix’ Email regarding  HTML WG to mean that we require any attributes we define to be ratified by that group. Not that we cannot use the ‘its-‘ prefix.   As you illustrate with your suggestions, not having a ‘namespace’ prefix like ‘its-‘ would require attribute names to take the form of cryptic conflated abbreviations  which would definitely impact the t the readability of attributes and thus, I imagine, generate some push back from the HTML folks.
>  
> Perhaps you or Felix could clarify.
>  
> Thanks
> Des
>