RE: M1 - Nov-15

• From: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>
• Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:37:33 +0100
• To: "'Yves Savourel'" <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <0f1801cdc421$0f68be60$2e3a3b20$@linguaserve.com>

Hi Yves, all,

I think we talk about this at Lyon, but regarding LQI would be a valid use case that in a process of machine translation plus human revision, the editor would be able to add LQI markup to inform of machine translation errors? I'm not so sure since this information it's likely not to get to the MT System developers ever.

Cheers,
Pablo.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] 
Enviado el: viernes, 16 de noviembre de 2012 16:16
Para: public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org
Asunto: Re: M1 - Nov-15

Hi Phil,

> Also, is there anything still gating the Quality related tests?
> Phil.

The Localization Quality Issue should be stable now, just waiting for approval to remove all the pointers minus one from the global rule.
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0103.html

The Localization Quality Précis however seems to be needing attention.
Mostly to decide if the global rule needs changes.
See https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/295

cheers,
-yves

Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 17:38:01 UTC