Re: Proceeding with [Core] via email discussion (Was Re: Postponed beginning for [Education], agenda for [Core])

On 1/5/2015 3:23 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 1/5/15 2:18 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>> In other words, Application Foundations is trying to look at the web 
>> standards problem by seeing what are the most pressing needs of "Web 
>> developers", aka, people who are writing Web Apps.  Does that 
>> clarify?  If so, how can I make the wording clearer?
>
>
> Clarified, via 
> <https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=AB%2F2014-2015_Priorities%2Fw3c_most_important&diff=80233&oldid=80232>.

Thanks.

>
>
>> After the AB approved the "most important" task force, the task force 
>> decided that this framework was a good starting point for the task 
>> force to develop priorities. The idea was to develop the framework 
>> further and use that to understand our priorities going forward and 
>> then present it to the AC (which is kinda what you suggested above).
>
> Another issue is the granularity of the priorities. Relevant levels 
> appear to include at least AppFoundation -> Activity -> Group -> Spec 
> -> Feature/UC/Requirement. Presumably, a measure of success will be if 
> this effort results in broad consensus about the priorities of the 
> finer details (especially if there is broad consensus among the 
> document's identified stakeholders).

Indeed, but it might take us several iterations to get to that level.

>
> -AB
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 20:27:06 UTC