- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 17:13:31 +0000
- To: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mobile Accessibility Task Force <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 01/11/2020 15:01, jake abma wrote: > you're so right and have been saying for a long time, mixem them and you > end up with all kind of quirks. > > But a minimum of 24 will break the internet, so if you let go and focus > on the 24 total, this is what we're after (the last proposed sentence > from me). > > We've talked on two variations for this potential SC, and the proposed > text Sukriti sent came out of the conversation, BUT the sentence I've > sent after covers exactly what we're after... But then, does it solve the original problem at all? If it doesn't (e.g. the two 1x1 px targets), then ... what's the point again? P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 17:13:46 UTC