- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:06 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: Mobile Accessibility Task Force <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 17:19:29 UTC
Is does, clicking the wrong one Op zo 1 nov. 2020 18:13 schreef Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>: > On 01/11/2020 15:01, jake abma wrote: > > you're so right and have been saying for a long time, mixem them and you > > end up with all kind of quirks. > > > > But a minimum of 24 will break the internet, so if you let go and focus > > on the 24 total, this is what we're after (the last proposed sentence > > from me). > > > > We've talked on two variations for this potential SC, and the proposed > > text Sukriti sent came out of the conversation, BUT the sentence I've > > sent after covers exactly what we're after... > > But then, does it solve the original problem at all? If it doesn't (e.g. > the two 1x1 px targets), then ... what's the point again? > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 17:19:29 UTC