- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 15:54:09 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: Mobile Accessibility Task Force <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 14:54:33 UTC
sadly "yes", but this is the same for all other options as we've chosen to NOT go for a minimum size... Op zo 1 nov. 2020 om 15:50 schreef Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk >: > On 01/11/2020 13:13, jake abma wrote: > > any feedback on?: "For each edge of a target, the distance to the > > closest edge of the nearest target on the opposite side is at least 24 > > CSS pixels, except when:": > > > > this one preserves all we've been after... I think > > What about two 1x1 px targets that are, say, 25px apart. would they pass? > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 14:54:33 UTC