- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 14:53:41 +0000
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 01/11/2020 14:50, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > On 01/11/2020 13:13, jake abma wrote: >> any feedback on?: "For each edge of a target, the distance to the >> closest edge of the nearest target on the opposite side is at least 24 >> CSS pixels, except when:": >> >> this one preserves all we've been after... I think > > What about two 1x1 px targets that are, say, 25px apart. would they pass? Again, I think if you're trying to somehow define BOTH a minimum size AND a minimum distance (in relation to the size), then you won't be able to do so by using one single measure somehow that contains both. They can be gamed either way since you're not defining how much of that distance should be spacing and how much should be target. Unless I'm missing a subtlety here. P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 14:53:56 UTC