Re: New possible SC: All functionality available in portrait / landscape, OR not?

Michale G says:

> Worse case scenario to meet the SC is the app will not change dimensions
at all and you just get the same layout with a lot of gutter/whitespace in
the other orientation.

My guess is that Chris's solution doesn't do that.

 "unlock the configuration, attach a ScrollView to your main content, and
let your view readjust to the viewport change."

Chris does this provide gutter space on the right if a portrait app was
turned to Landscape, or does everything reorient including spacing to fill
out the entire width. How easy is it to just keep the portrait view and
throw in the correct black gutter space across dozens of form factors?



Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:57 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 01/05/2019 14:51, Michael Gower wrote:
> > But an 'ugly but functional' design in the alternate orientation is a
> > whole lot better
>
> I'll echo DMcD here though and say that most brand-aware/corporate
> clients will simply not want an "ugly but functional" experience
> (particularly one that can be triggered so easily by end users) unless
> absolutely forced to (which, until the introduction of this SC, they had
> no normative incentive to do).
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2019 14:22:41 UTC