- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 14:57:38 +0100
- To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>, Chris McMeeking <chris.mcmeeking@deque.com>
- Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.com>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 01/05/2019 14:51, Michael Gower wrote: > But an 'ugly but functional' design in the alternate orientation is a > whole lot better I'll echo DMcD here though and say that most brand-aware/corporate clients will simply not want an "ugly but functional" experience (particularly one that can be triggered so easily by end users) unless absolutely forced to (which, until the introduction of this SC, they had no normative incentive to do). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2019 13:58:03 UTC