- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 08:07:39 +0100
- To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.com>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 01/05/2019 03:11, Michael Gower wrote: > There is no requirement in Orientation regarding the content > presentation beyond the simple requirement that the author not lock it > to an orientation. It's crucial to differentiate this requirement from > anything to do with how content may be altered when the reorientation > happens; that is not in scope. Yes, I believe the discussion here (which I jumped into with my reply) was about retrospectively expanding the scope of the SC, rather than creating a new SC. (which I believe is not really possible in general) P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2019 07:08:03 UTC