Re: Rough draft of some success criteria for a extension guideline "Touch accessible"

Current
2.5.4 No Swipe Trap: When touch input behavior is modified by built-in
assistive technology so that touch focus can be moved to a component of the
page using swipe gestures, then focus can be moved away from that component
using swipe gestures or the user is advised of the method for moving focus
away. (Level A)


How about

*2.5.4
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#keyboard-operation-trapping>**No
Swipe Trap:* If focus can be moved to a component of the page using a swipe
gesture with platform assistive technology
<http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/keyboard-operation-trapping.html#keybrd-interfacedef>,
then focus can be moved away from that component using only a swipe
gesture, or, if it requires more than a swipe or other standard exit
method, the user is advised of the method for moving focus away. (Level A)

Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

www.Can-Adapt.com



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:45 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Good first stab.. most look good.
> 2.5.4 is confusing... we'll probably need to cycle around on that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Detlev Fischer <
> detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan
>>
>> > I did have a question about the target clearance 2.5.6. With target size
>> > stated as 9 mm in 2.5.5, a Center spacing of targets of 9mm would not
>> > give any space between targets. Please confirm if I have read your
>> > information correctly or not. Best Regards. Alan
>>
>> Yes, I wrote it this way on purpose. You could argue that if each target
>> is 9mm
>> wide and well delineated from neighbours, it would be OK to present
>> targets
>> without spacing. Think of a row of square icons with outlines or
>> contrasting
>> colors. This row should be operable by touch without any spacing. Once
>> targets
>> get smaller than 9 mm, spacing would be needed. But I am not sure whether
>> this
>> view is shared by others - it's just a draft that we can change.
>>
>> Best,
>> Detlev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>