Re: Rough draft of some success criteria for a extension guideline "Touch accessible"

Good first stab.. most look good.
2.5.4 is confusing... we'll probably need to cycle around on that.

Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

www.Can-Adapt.com



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Detlev Fischer <
detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:

> Hi Alan
>
> > I did have a question about the target clearance 2.5.6. With target size
> > stated as 9 mm in 2.5.5, a Center spacing of targets of 9mm would not
> > give any space between targets. Please confirm if I have read your
> > information correctly or not. Best Regards. Alan
>
> Yes, I wrote it this way on purpose. You could argue that if each target
> is 9mm
> wide and well delineated from neighbours, it would be OK to present targets
> without spacing. Think of a row of square icons with outlines or
> contrasting
> colors. This row should be operable by touch without any spacing. Once
> targets
> get smaller than 9 mm, spacing would be needed. But I am not sure whether
> this
> view is shared by others - it's just a draft that we can change.
>
> Best,
> Detlev
>
>
>
>