- From: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:45:28 -0700
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
I am still confused on the HTML5 use case for xmlsh. What would be the purpose of authoring MicroXML if what you want is HTML5 ? Why not author directly in HTML5 ... The only use case I can think of is if you are post-processing MicroXML to produce HTML, In which case these little issues go away as your processing code can reformat things however HTML wants them, they don't need to be byte-by-byte supported in MicroXML. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Lee Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation dlee@marklogic.com Phone: +1 812-482-5223 Cell: +1 812-630-7622 www.marklogic.com -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 12:08 PM To: public-microxml@w3.org Subject: Re: What to do about newlines in attribute values? On 14/09/2012 18:13, David Lee wrote: > Maybe the story for Microxml based languages could "don't do that" ... e.g. perhaps but it depends a bit on our HTML(5) story. HTML5 parsing includes svg (without explicit svg namespace) it just seems that saying attribute values have to be a single line is putting a constraint on authors to avoid an edge case that rarely causes problems in practice. Do we really want to say that you shouldn't use microxml to author html documents such as the example document in the polyglot spec? David
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 19:45:52 UTC