- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:24:25 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:08 +0700, James Clark wrote: > If PIs are not in the MicroXML data model, then that implies, in my view, > that normal (non-markup sensitive) applications SHOULD NOT act on PIs. But > that is clearly not what we want. For example, we would want a browser to > act on an xml-stylesheet PI. I don't really see this as any different from wanting a browser to act on commented-out JavaScript or CSS, and <style type="text/css"><!-- .. . --></style> is actually fairly common practice and works (the CSS is intepreted). Whether that is good and clean is a question only in a world of speculation (as T S Eliot might've said). Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ XML Past and XML Future are both contained in Root Element...
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 04:24:47 UTC