- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:48:09 +0700
- To: liam@w3.org
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 04:48:57 UTC
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:08 +0700, James Clark wrote: > > > If PIs are not in the MicroXML data model, then that implies, in my view, > > that normal (non-markup sensitive) applications SHOULD NOT act on PIs. > But > > that is clearly not what we want. For example, we would want a browser to > > act on an xml-stylesheet PI. > > I don't really see this as any different from wanting a browser to act > on commented-out JavaScript or CSS, and > <style type="text/css"><!-- > .. . > --></style> > is actually fairly common practice and works (the CSS is intepreted). > > Whether that is good and clean is a question only in a world of > speculation (as T S Eliot might've said). It's about as far from good and clean as anything can be. James
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 04:48:57 UTC