- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:35:05 +0100
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
> Lurking in on these conversations, it seems to me that the group is in > danger of deciding to include a feature if there is evidence of existing XML > users who use it. I think we've been doing ok so far at rejecting virtually every feature :) > The inevitable consequence of that, I fear, would be that > the specification will be such a large subset of XML that it serves no > useful purpose. A better criterion might be to include a feature only if > there is no alternative practical way of meeting the same requirement. Agreed, "mixed content and nothing else". -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 08:41:07 UTC