- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:25:23 +0100
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
On 05/09/2012 08:04, Stephen D Green wrote: > Sorry to be a bit late to the party. Sorry to be even later. > I'd like both parties to be able to parse this very > common variety of XML document: > <abc xmlns:xsi="..." xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="..."> > ... > </abc> > Lurking in on these conversations, it seems to me that the group is in danger of deciding to include a feature if there is evidence of existing XML users who use it. The inevitable consequence of that, I fear, would be that the specification will be such a large subset of XML that it serves no useful purpose. A better criterion might be to include a feature only if there is no alternative practical way of meeting the same requirement. Michael Kay Saxonica
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 07:28:06 UTC