- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:44:01 +0100
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
On 04/09/2012 05:01, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 21:33 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > >> 4. Are PIs allowed? This is the most controversial remaining item. >> Everyone seems to agree that limiting them to start-tag format would be >> a Good Thing. I see three positions: >> >> A: No PIs. >> >> B: No PIs except in the prolog. >> >> C: PIs everywhere, as in XML. > > I think they should be allowed and should not be in the data model. > > It's not perfect but I think I am coming to this view as well (which basically also aligns with html5 "bogus comment" usage.) Allowing it in the syntax allows micro-xml editing tools to create documents using <?xml-stylesheet or <?php or whatever which is possibly a good thing, even if it takes a full xml processing system to process the PIs. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 08:53:16 UTC