- From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:14:37 +0100
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAA0AChUKZ4COP0kyuHBk13wGecVX5mwTD+z4dRg93=B__H39jQ@mail.gmail.com>
A related user story is that I'd also like that both parties be able to parse the schema at the given schema location in <abc xmlns:xsi="..." xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="..."> ... </abc> so I'd like it that an XML Schema can be written (albeit in simplified form) such that both a standard XML parser and a MicroXML parser be able to parse it (even if not able to process it or validate the document using it). ---- Stephen D Green On 5 September 2012 08:04, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>wrote: > Sorry to be a bit late to the party. > > Re 'prefixes on attributes', I was previously unconvinced but > the user story that has won me over somewhat is (though not > intrinsic to web use of XML/MicroXML) where I am a party > in an exchange of XML documents where one party has full > XML capabilities but the other some limitation at some stage > to MicroXML. I'd like both parties to be able to parse this very > common variety of XML document: > > <abc xmlns:xsi="..." xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="..."> > ... > </abc> > > > ---- > Stephen D Green > > >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 07:21:17 UTC