- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 08:58:27 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua2KcwWvcphdGU_D34LLapoyjc9oq7xYq-c+3p_-JUyxng@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 21:33 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > > 7. Are CDATA sections allowed? The consensus so far seems to be no. > > They help spec writers, but they provide a loophole against escaping > > content that doesn't actually work. Nobody has asked for them. > > No. No. No. Good god no. I opposed them in XML too. > > CDATA injection attacks are not worth the tiny tiny benefit. > > Spec writers can use XInclude, except that we've outlawed it :) > No CDATA Sections. As for XInclude, we'll find another way (a Micro way). -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 14:58:49 UTC