Aside from that, I reckon canonicalisation and XML diffs are so important as to warrant inclusion. Comparing microXML documents will be such a commonly occurring requirement for developers. ---- Stephen D Green On 2 October 2012 13:26, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote: > Why / in what sense "unique"? I think I know what is meant > but it could be taken the wrong way. Clearly two documents > can have identical canonical versions and therefore neither > be 'unique'. > ---- > Stephen D Green > > > > On 2 October 2012 13:05, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > >> ... >> The Canonical MicroXML for a document is the unique MicroXML document that >> >> ... >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 12:31:56 UTC