- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:37:53 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua2f4-vEHB+Og--wJnywRpuaok6TxhYgNuDrE-u2QhWY1w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>wrote: > Why / in what sense "unique"? I think I know what is meant > but it could be taken the wrong way. Clearly two documents > can have identical canonical versions and therefore neither > be 'unique'. > But each c14n would be unique in respect to a particular transform. James's wording is clearly talking about the range, not the domain. In other words the output of a c14n transform is unique even though its inputs need not be. I'm not sure it would be clearer to use wording to the effect that it's a many to one transform. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 13:38:21 UTC