Re: Canonical MicroXML from Stephen D Green on 2012-10-02 (public-microxml@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:26:56 +0100
To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Cc: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAA0AChVMZ0Fppxg1XSiZCfHSEHbYVR=sXxKoX64y_LVAJUohuQ@mail.gmail.com>

Why / in what sense "unique"? I think I know what is meant
but it could be taken the wrong way. Clearly two documents
can have identical canonical versions and therefore neither
be 'unique'.
----
Stephen D Green



On 2 October 2012 13:05, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote:

> ...
> The Canonical MicroXML for a document is the unique MicroXML document that
>
> ...
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 12:27:50 UTC