- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:22:06 +0700
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
I think we've now waited long enough for news of this CG to percolate through to interested parties, so let's get cracking. I suspect that one of the hardest parts of this effort will be to get consensus on what the point of MicroXML is. I don't want the process to be too heavyweight here, so perhaps one way to get started is to generate a short list of design goals, analogous to the design goals at the start of the XML 1.0 spec. Here's a very rough first attempt: 1. The syntax of MicroXML shall be a subset of XML 1.0 2. MicroXML shall define a data model as well as a syntax 3. MicroXML shall be dramatically simpler than XML as regards its specification, syntax and data model 4. MicroXML shall be designed to complement rather than replace XML, JSON and HTML 5. MicroXML shall support the needs of documents, in particular mixed content 6. MicroXML shall support Unicode 7. MicroXML shall facilitiate the creation of documents that are simultaneously well-formed MicroXML and valid HTML5 James
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 02:22:54 UTC