- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:47:08 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 09:22 +0700, James Clark wrote: > Here's a very rough first attempt: > > 1. The syntax of MicroXML shall be a subset of XML 1.0 I.e. every well-formed MicroXML document shall be well-formed XML? (some classes of change to XML are possible to help MicroXML, at least in principle) > 2. MicroXML shall define a data model as well as a syntax > 3. MicroXML shall be dramatically simpler than XML as regards its > specification, syntax and data model > 4. MicroXML shall be designed to complement rather than replace XML, > JSON and HTML > 5. MicroXML shall support the needs of documents, in particular mixed content > 6. MicroXML shall support Unicode > 7. MicroXML shall facilitiate the creation of documents that are > simultaneously well-formed MicroXML and valid HTML5 Is it productive also to say that such documents created as per (7) shall have similar or identical interpretations in XML, MicroXML and HTML? Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 02:47:43 UTC