- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:04:29 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua0nX9vTbLob_xbbUfL4drsBfrDNrCp7F+7OFkp354RUPw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > If micro-xml is sold as a simple data model with a simple language but > most of the spec is describing the extra rules relating to features of > the language not supported by the data model and require augmented specs > from the full xml stack, then something has gone terribly wrong. > But most of the spec will not be describing such features, so we are safe from this. > If micro xml users need not invent new conventions for whitespace > control and can go xml:space="preserve" then the micro xml data model > had better have properties on text nodes to say that that are or are not > ignorable white space. All text nodes would be preserved by MicroXML/Option-A-prime, and so would all xml:space attributes. This means that a space preservation layer has everything it needs to deal with that matter even though it's not explicitly represented in the MicroXML data model. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 21:04:57 UTC