- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:09:09 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua2MUN02jH95Ww+eQiDz+VVD=yXFenteFmSqsSGsRLGSWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 14:41 -0600, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > I had thought Liam was saying that the particular case of > > xml:space="funky" is defined as a WF error in XML 1.0. > > It is, but the spec is sloppy about it: > > [[ > This specification does not give meaning to any value of xml:space other > than "default" and "preserve". It is an error for other values to be > specified; the XML processor may report the error or may recover by > ignoring the attribute specification or by reporting the (erroneous) > value to the application. Applications may ignore or reject erroneous > values. > ]] > Thanks Liam. I do not think this quoted text puts into jeopardy a claim that "all MicroXML docs are WF XML 1.0 docs." -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 21:09:37 UTC