- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:41:52 -0400
- To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Cc: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
David Lee scripsit: > So you are suggesting uXML "names" have NO equivalent to XML or XML+NS > QNames at all ? Such a thing is not a formal requirement, but it's easy to see what it would be under option A-prime. The MicroXML name is the prefix followed by a colon, if there is a prefix, concatenated with the local name. In the reverse direction, MicroXML names without colons are mapped to a QName whose local name is the MicroXML name, whose prefix is empty, and whose namespace name is likewise empty; MicroXML names beginning "xml:" are mapped to a QName whose local name is the part after the colon, whose prefix is "xml", and whose namespace name is "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace". That's all very easy. With the data-model-compatibility issue cleared away, I see no reason to forbid "xml:" prefixes. -- We pledge allegiance to the penguin John Cowan and to the intellectual property regime cowan@ccil.org for which he stands, one world under http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Linux, with free music and open source software for all. --Julian Dibbell on Brazil, edited
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:42:15 UTC