- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:47:09 -0400
- To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Cc: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>, public-microxml@w3.org
Andrew Welch scripsit:
> I'm yet to see any benefit of allowing the xml:* attributes, only
> negatives, and any user needing those attributes would be better off
> with XML (imho)
Surely you don't mean that users who need to express element identity
or language identification should not use MicroXML.
So you must mean that users with those needs should not be allowed to
use the same syntax in MicroXML that is used in XML.
But why, exactly, given that the xml: prefix (unlike all others) doesn't
get you in trouble with the XML Namespace model?
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Half the lies they tell about me are true.
--Tallulah Bankhead, American actress
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:47:31 UTC