- From: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:13:45 +0100
- To: Yunjia Li <yl2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F7250579-309C-42D4-A669-02412CE09776@ugent.be>
Dear all (but especially implementors Chris, Davy, Tom, Yunjia), To go to REC, all features need 2 implementations. As one can see now in the current implementation report [1], the following features are likely of being removed to an additional 'note' (as was done with the server-side impl): track, id, and SMPTE & clock for t Please, as an implementor, provide before this friday 25/11 per Test Case what the likelihood (the options are … 0%, 50%, 100%) is that an implementation could be made by mid december 2011: - TC0021-UA (SMPTE) - TC0025-UA (clock) - TC0026-UA (clock) - TC0056-UA (track) - TC0057-UA (track) - TC0060-UA (track) - TC0096-UA (track) - TC0023-UA (SMPTE) (if TC gets approved) - TC0099-UA (SMPTE) (if TC gets approved) - TC0100-UA (SMPTE) (if TC gets approved) - TC0101-UA (id) (if TC gets approved) - TC0102-UA (id) (if TC gets approved) [1]: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-impl/ Sincere greetings, Erik Mannens, PhD Research Unit Leader - Future Media & Imaging Dept. Ghent University - IBBT Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Dept. ELIS - MMLab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium T: +32 9 331 49 93 F: +32 9 331 48 96 M: +32 473 27 44 17 E: erik.mannens@ugent.be W: http://www.mmlab.be/emannens http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:14:30 UTC