- From: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:20:47 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <AF2F4327-2B78-4F71-8E31-EE16C2CB3B57@ugent.be>
Dear all, The minutes of today's phone telecon are available for review at http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format below). Talk to you all next week ... - if Philip committed his 3 patches & Raphael committed his small actions by the end of the week -> Go to LCWD ! - please respond to Silvia's HTML5-Bugs thread by end of the week -> Silvia will answer to HTML5 WG Sincere greetings, Erik Mannens Project Manager Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium T: +32 9 331 49 93 F: +32 9 331 48 96 M: +32 473 27 44 17 E: erik.mannens@ugent.be W: http://www.mmlab.be/emannens http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be --- Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 16 Feb 2011 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present Erik, Davy, Silvia, Philip Regrets Raphael, Thomas, Yves Chair Erik Scribe Erik Contents Topics ADMIN MEDIA FRAGMENT SPECIFICATION HTML5 / WHATWG Liaison AOB Summary of Action Items <trackbot> Date: 16 February 2011 <scribe> scribe: Erik <scribe> ScribeNick: Erik <foolip> I'll be on IRC <foolip> but would like to go for lunch soon <foolip> what does "approve" mean, and what happens if I don't? ADMIN PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the last week telecon: http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-mediafrag-minutes.html +1 <davy> +1 <silvia> +1 RESOLUTION: last week's minutes accepted MEDIA FRAGMENT SPECIFICATION So Philip, are you happy with the spec now (concerning your issue-19)? fyi ... ISSUE-19 [Philippe]: Parsing must be defined normatively in the MF spec itself fyi ... ISSUE-19 [Philippe]: Parsing must be defined normatively in the MF spec itself <foolip> no, not last I checked <foolip> let me dig up the mail I sent <foolip> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Dec/0035.html <foolip> no reply to that yet and no spec change as far as I'm aware <foolip> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/19 is still in state OPEN, as it should OK, chicken vs egg ... are you happy to commit these 4 patches yourself? and then the rest of the group has to object within a week ... if no objections, we go to LCWD, what do you think? <foolip> I could, but I'm certain that it won't be popular <foolip> I could perhaps be more moderate and only *add* stuff, leaving in things that I'd personally rather see removed <foolip> ok, will give it a go foolip ... no disagreement any more (about e.g. parsing name-value pairs) foolip ... some patches were already installed, others were omitted ... some patches will add stuff, others will remove stuff foolip ... but most is editorial stuff, no real issues anymore <scribe> ACTION: philip to merge the first 3 patches of his mail of 15/12/2010 into the spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-212 - Merge the first 3 patches of his mail of 15/12/2010 into the spec [on Philip Jägenstedt - due 2011-02-23]. for the record: if no objections by the rest of the group, Philippe (as the last one of the WG) is happy to move on to LCWG for the 2nd time HTML5 / WHATWG Liaison <silvia> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2011Feb/0002.html davy ... will comment on Silvia's thread too on mailing list <silvia> if people could please send their opinions on this, too, that would be appreciated <silvia> email to the thread <silvia> then we can decide next week silvia ... really wants all comments by next week, so she can move forward with this issue to the HTML5 group all other topics will be handled next week when we have more people on board! AOB - Davy and Erik attended Web & TV workshop @ Berlin last week ... most prominent discussions were: and minutes are to be found : http://www.w3.org/2011/02/08-webtv-minutes.html and http://www.w3.org/2011/02/09-webtv-minutes.html scribe: summary of workshop will be available soon. <davy> W3C Web & TV workshop: lots of discussions regarding HTTP adaptive streaming <davy> MPEG DASH seems to become the standard for HTTP streaming <davy> there are still some doubts whether DASH will be royalty free or not <davy> Also, the integration of MPEG DASH within HTML5 was discussed <davy> -> related with the Multitrack API Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: philip to merge the first 3 patches of his mail of 15/12/2010 into the spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 11:21:46 UTC