- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:07:40 +1100
- To: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Can we also deal with the HTML5 bugs, please? Silvia. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be> wrote: > Dear Media Fragmenters, > > > Please, find attached the agenda for this week telecon, http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=16&month=02&year=2011&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > > - primarily getting Philip's approval to go to second LCWD > - feedback of Web & TV workshop > - > > Regrets for Raphaël, who will be in a project review meeting at this hour. > > > Best regards. > > Erik & Raphaël > > ------------ > > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2011-02-16 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Wednesday, 16 February *10:00-11:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=16&month=02&year=2011&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > > 16 February 2011, 1000 UTC > 0200 (West US) > 1000 (Galway) > 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) > 1900 (Tokyo) > 2100 (Sydney) > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Bridge FR: +33.4.26.46.79.03 > Bridge UK: +44.203.318.0479 > Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") > Duration : 60 minutes > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 > W3C IRC Web Client : http://irc.w3.org/ and http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC > Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim > Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html > Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Chair: Erik > ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList > Scribe: Conrad, Michael, Jack > Regrets: Raphael > > Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by members and invited experts only. > > 1. ADMIN: > * Roll call > * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the last week telecon: http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-mediafrag-minutes.html > * Feedback from Web & TV workshop @ Berlin last week > > 2. MEDIA FRAGMENT SPECIFICATION: > * ISSUE-19 [Philippe]: Parsing must be defined normatively in the MF spec itself > ** Philippe's proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Nov/0008.html and http://people.opera.com/philipj/2010/11/04/media-fragments-spec/overview.html > * ACTION-196: Raphaël to address comments from the Media Annotations WG and draft a reply > ** Media Annotations WG: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Oct/0000.html > ** Chris Double: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0099.html > * ISSUE-18 [Raphael]: RTSP processing of Media Fragments URI > ** See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0065.html > > * PROPOSAL: group vote on transition to another LCWD > > 3. HTML5 / WHATWG Liaison: > * HTML5 bug follow-up: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 > * WHATWG thread: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-January/029724.html > * ACTION-211: Silvia to start a new thread on what bugs to submit to HTML5 > > 4. OPEN ISSUES > * ISSUE-17 [Yves]: Media Fragment track names and IRIs > ** See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0056.html > ** Invite Adison in a telecon ASAP > * ISSUE-20 [Yves]: Create a IETF draft at CR stage explaining what the media fragment semantics will be for video/*, image/*, audio/* > ** Non blocking for transitioning to CR > > 5. TEST CASES > * ACTION-146: Jack to identify and add in corrib any missing test cases for temporal fragments > ** See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010May/0048.html > ** Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html > * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases? > * ISSUE-10 [Michael]: Media Fragments Test Case Maintenance > > 6. Use Cases and Requirements: > * From Ericsson (media fragment URI for video chat): https://labs.ericsson.com/developer-community/blog/beyond-html5-conversational-voice-and-video-implemented-webkit-gtk > * From Google: SemWebVid? > * From HTTP Streaming? > * Image sprite in HTML5: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010May/0061.html > ** Specify how to render Media Fragments in UA? Write a reply to HTML5? > * Use Case from Europeana: > ** Robert Sanderson: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jul/0010.html > ** Bernhard Haslhofer: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Sep/0000.html > ** Add this use case in the UC & Requirements document? > * Solution: > ** An extra parameter in the Media Fragment URI? > ** A new attribute in the HTML5 media element? > * From NEC: > ** WIKI ? > > 7. AOB > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 00:08:33 UTC