- From: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:08:23 +0100
- To: <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002901caaa41$5c4ce5a0$14e6b0e0$@mannens@ugent.be>
Dear all, The minutes of today's phoneconf are available for review at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format below). Thx Silvia for the scribe! Have a nice week & talk to you all next Wednesday (don't forget to read the 'temporal' test cases). Sincere greetings, Erik Mannens Project Manager Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium T: +32 9 331 49 93 F: +32 9 331 48 96 M: +32 473 27 44 17 E: erik.mannens@ugent.be W: http://www.mmlab.be/emannens http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 10 Feb 2010 Agenda <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Feb/0013.html > See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-irc> Attendees Present Erik, Davy, Raphael, Michael, Silvia, Thierry Regrets Yves, Conrad Chair Raphael, Erik Scribe silvia Contents * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#agenda> 1. 1. <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#item01> ADMIN 2. 2. F2F <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#item02> Meeting 3. 3. <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#item03> SPECIFICATION 4. 4. <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#item04> ISSUES 5. 5. TEST <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#item05> CASES: (Michael) 6. 7. AOB <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#item06> * Summary <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#ActionSummary> of Action Items _____ <trackbot> Date: 10 February 2010 Meeting open Raphael: focus on two things ... * "ready for implementation" markings ... * test cases 1. ADMIN PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 03 February 2009 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/03-mediafrag-minutes.html <mhausenblas> +1 <raphael> +1 <erik> +1 +1 <davy> +1 raphael: accepted RE: ACTION-127: Thierry/Yves to look for the charter extension thierry: WG was extended for a year, until end Jan 2011 RESOLUTION: accept the minutes of the 03 February 2009 telecon thierry: management wants public to react on document ... wants to get Last Call asap <Zakim> mhausenblas, you wanted to ask re HTTPbis dependecies close ACTION-127 <trackbot> ACTION-127 Look for the charter extension closed mhausenblas: HTTPbis dependencies should be addressed at f2f <raphael> Michael: is there any dependencies with HTTPBis ... also in last call thierry: extension will be announced today or tomorrow RE: ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers Erik: hopefully finishes his part by weekend and hopes to send edits next week 2. F2F Meeting Draft Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FithF2FAgenda raphael: add topics to wiki, everything you'd like us to discuss ... also things we should conclude on ... venue and zakim booking are done 3. SPECIFICATION RE: ACTION-134: Erik to mark up the spec with normative and informative classes raphael: thinks it's too early for such markup ... should be last thing we do ... still subject to lots of discussions ... could start marking up on the parts that are major silvia: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Feb/0007.html ... has a list of things that could be marked up already ... not possible for everything of course raphael: would rather want to get implementations mhausenblas: agree, statements are too early ... could change still raphael: support the path that silvia mentions <mhausenblas> Michael: we should flag stable vs. unstable sections rather than normative vs. informative raphael: just marking some sections as "ready for implementation" <raphael> Section: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#npt-time <raphael> is stable providing the correction of the npt bug <mhausenblas> Michael: this is IMO, what implementers are primarily interested in <raphael> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processin g-protocol-UA-mapped raphael: correct npt scheme ... no action yet ... should include diagrams that Erik sent <mhausenblas> ACTION-126? <trackbot> ACTION-126 -- Yves Lafon to follow up on error in ABFN for npt -- due 2009-12-23 -- OPEN <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/126 silvia: Yves said he would do the changes by next week raphael: make sure Yves completes by next week erik: first job on diagrams ... only includes main headers, not all headers michael: should include all headers silvia: haven't looked at the diagrams indepth michael: a decision for who marks it up to include what is most important erik: will look at it again silvia: we could also rely on implementers to give us feedback raphael: suggest to give action to somebody to integrate diagrams into document <scribe> ACTION: silvia to include Erik's diagrams into specification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-138 - Include Erik's diagrams into specification [on Silvia Pfeiffer - due 2010-02-17]. UNKNOWN_SPEAKER: silvia to also include source files erik: diagrams got generated automatically <mhausenblas> http://www.websequencediagrams.com/ erik: from websequencediagrams ... diagrams are public ... put links into wiki ... silvia will add links to originals into comment and add files into cvs raphael: need somebody to mark sections as implementable <raphael> ACTION-134? <trackbot> ACTION-134 -- Erik Mannens to mark up the spec with normative and informative classes -- due 2010-02-10 -- OPEN <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/134 <raphael> ACTION-133? <trackbot> ACTION-133 -- Erik Mannens to will try to generate some time diagram for the protocol description in the section 5.2.1.x -- due 2010-02-03 -- OPEN <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/133 close ACTION-133 <trackbot> ACTION-133 Will try to generate some time diagram for the protocol description in the section 5.2.1.x closed scribe: if everyone agrees on the list of chapters that silvia said are implementable, they should be marked up as such <no objections> <mhausenblas> +1 <davy> +1 <raphael> Is there strong disagreement for marking up these parts in the document ? <raphael> ... as stable <raphael> good, no objections <scribe> ACTION: silvia to mark up specified sections as implementable [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-139 - Mark up specified sections as implementable [on Silvia Pfeiffer - due 2010-02-17]. <raphael> ACTION-135? <trackbot> ACTION-135 -- Erik Mannens to extend section 5 regarding spatial and track dimension -- due 2010-02-10 -- OPEN <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/135 <raphael> ACTION-136? <trackbot> ACTION-136 -- Davy Van Deursen to create a diagram of video timeline to explain temporal dimension -- due 2010-02-10 -- OPEN <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/136 RE: ACTION-135: Davy, Erik to extend section 5 regarding spatial and track dimension <scribe> ongoing close ACTION-136 <trackbot> ACTION-136 Create a diagram of video timeline to explain temporal dimension closed 4. ISSUES later 5. TEST CASES: (Michael) michael hasn't had the time to spend on test cases raphael: need another volunteer to keep this going michael: I will not be able to drive this ... need a volunteer to take over erik: we can do it but not before april <raphael> Silvia: I'm not sure we need a responsible person, no stress on someone in particular <raphael> ... it could be a collective effort <raphael> Michael: I think you're right, but getting a person setting up the policy for external reviews is important <raphael> ... for that, it is good to have a face silvia: could be part of the natural sequence of (1) defining use case, (2) defining solution, (3) defining error and test cases raphael: during f2f we could collectively discuss test cases that are well enough defined <mhausenblas> Michael: the 'collective approach' actually made me propose/implement http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ raphael: we should do all of the above :) ... define test cases during f2f ... have a person responsible from April to follow up michael: main motivation is to get the implementation report in just one click ... this is what corrib has been set up for <tmichel> A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Requirements michael: should be decided at f2f <tmichel> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-test-methodology-20100128/> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-test-methodology-20100128/ erik: I like the one-click approach to report <tmichel> document presents a method for writing, marking-up, and analyzing conformance requirements in technical specifications. silvia: agree to having somebody responsible to look after corrib for checking implementation conformance micheal: implementation report is part of our charter +1 erik: exit criteria we will write in CR document raphael: should we look at test cases now? michael: can show what I've done so far ... classification of test cases ... move into wiki <mhausenblas> ACTION-115? <trackbot> ACTION-115 -- Michael Hausenblas to come up with categorization of test cases wrt empty, undefined, etc -- due 2009-09-30 -- CLOSED <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/115 michael: uploaded an rdf document that defined all the cases <mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/TC/mftc silvia: is that out of corrib? erik: can we get a more readable version? <mhausenblas> ACTION: mhausenb to create a more readable version of the TC classification at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/TC/mftc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03] <trackbot> Created ACTION-140 - Create a more readable version of the TC classification at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/TC/mftc [on Michael Hausenblas - due 2010-02-17]. silvia: for me it's not about readability, but about how to edit michael: you have access to the file - it's in cvs ... will create a readable html page out of it silvia: question whether we should address the test case for time dimension michael: what differences did you have silvia: only one major difference to before michael: would need to work through the list ... prefer to delay to next week erik: any other topic? 7. AOB <no reactions> erik: thanks everyone em wonders if I sometimes mixed up erik and davy... s/em/me/ ;) <mhausenblas> [adjourned] Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: mhausenb to create a more readable version of the TC classification at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/TC/mftc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: silvia to include Erik's diagrams into specification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: silvia to mark up specified sections as implementable [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/10-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02] [End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 11:09:09 UTC