Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 29 July, Telecon 1200 UTC

Hi everybody,

Could we add to the agenda the issues about live streams that I sent
emails on this week? I'd like to make those changes to both
specification documents, but would want a quick discussion amongst all
of us to agree.

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:46 PM, erik mannens<erik.mannens@ugent.be> wrote:
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
>
>
>
>
>
> Please, find below the agenda for tomorrow’s telecon.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=29&month=07&year=2009&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> Raphaël & Erik
>
>
>
> ------------
>
>
>
> AGENDA Teleconference
>
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2009-07-29
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Wednesday, 29 July *12:00-13:00 UTC*
>
> Local time:
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=29&month=07&year=2009&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
>
>
>
>
>
> 29 July 2009, 1200 UTC
>
>               0500 (West US)
>
>               1300 (Galway)
>
>               1400 (Amsterdam, Paris, Pretoria)
>
>               2100 (Tokyo)
>
>               2200 (Sydney)
>
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
>
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
>
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
>
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
>
> Duration : 60 minutes
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
>
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
>
> Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
>
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
>
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
>
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Chair: Raphael/Erik
>
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
>
> Scribe: Conrad, Erik
>
> Regrets: Jack, Yves
>
>
>
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
>
> members and invited experts only.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. ADMIN:
>
> * Roll call
>
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 15 & 22 July 2009 telecon:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/07/15-mediafrag-minutes.html
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/07/22-mediafrag-minutes.html
>
> * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers (ongoing …
> re-raise around 15/09/09)
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. UC & REQUIREMENTS:
>
> * ACTION-68: Raphael to ask the Media Annotations WG to review our document
>
> * ACTION-74: Erik, Raphael, and Yves to request feedback of other groups
> such
>
> as SYMM, SVG, HTML + WHATWG, WAI, MAWG, TAG, MobileWeb, TimedText (ongoing …
> re-raise around 15/09/09)
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
>
>
>
> 3.1 Syntax: (Yves)
>
> * ACTION-49: Yves to Draft the HTTP-Range syntax for different units
>
> (completing all the syntax for the two way handshake) (ongoing … re-raise
> around 15/08/09, after IETF Meeting)
>
> * ACTION-93: Michael to revisit the TC and see which are affected by the
> temporal-optional-comma-decision
>
>
>
> 3.2 UA Server HTTP Communication (Conrad/Raphael)
>
> * ACTION-69: Conrad to draw a representation of the general structure of
>
> a media resource, for streamable formats (ongoing … re-raise around
> 01/09/09, when having had full discussion)
>
>
>
> 3.3 UA MF Resolution and Processing: (Michael)
>
> * ACTION-64: Michael to write into the WD section 6.4, what the client
>
> should do with #everything after the hash : "Client Side Media Fragment
>
> Resolution" (See also ISSUE-7)
>
>
>
>
>
> 4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
>
> * See: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TestCases
>
> ** review some more TC’s
>
>
>
>
>
> 5. ISSUES
>
> * ISSUE-3 [Michael]: Does our MF URI syntax imply that we need to update
>
> MIME Type registrations?
>
> ** ACTION-89: Yves to find out more about fragment identifier registration
> (ongoing … re-raise around 15/08/09, after IETF Meeting)
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-4 [Silvia] : Should we pre-define some track names?
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
>
> client-side
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
>
> ** ACTION-62: Yves to ask the TAG whether transcoding should be
>
> forbidden or not when we send a fragment of a resource
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
>
> ** ACTION-64: Michael to write into the WD section 6.4, what the client
> should do with #everything after the hash : "Client Side Media Fragment
> Resolution"
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
>
> ** ACTION-82: Michael to flesh out TC vocabulary re ISSUE-9
>
>
>
> * ISSUE-10 [Michael] : Media Fragments Test Case Maintenance
>
>
>
>
>
> 6. IMPLEMENTATION:
>
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
>
> implement the logic on client side
>
> * ACTION-91: Guillaume to look at the python gst lib
>
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
>
> logic could be implemented on client side
>
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
>
> doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
>
> * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an
>
> implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments
>
> parsing
>
> * ACTION-90: Davy to provide a pointer to Yves to a lib he can use to slice
> media files
>
>
>
>
>
> 7. AOB
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> http://www.ibbt.be/en/disclaimer
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 14:41:52 UTC