Re: ACTION-76 : Question if MPEG-21 Part 17 got registered on IANA as a media mime type for fragments

At 19:40  +1000 13/07/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>I checked the documents - while the mime types are registered, the
>proposed fragment addressing schemes are not part of those
>registration documents. I think that was the point that Erik was
>trying to make. If this is incorrect, please explain - maybe the
>fragment addressing schemes were registered differently.
>
>Regards,
>Silvia.

correct, but I don't think they need to be; the fragment details are 
in the referenced specifications, so the fragment scheme is defined 
for both, in the formal sense...

>
>On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, David Singer<singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>  The MPEG-21 and MPEG-4 media types are both registered, MPEG-21 recently.
>>
>>  From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-mime@iana.org>
>>
>>  Date: July 8, 2009 2:22:47 AM GMT+02:00
>>
>>  Cc: christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at, singer@apple.com
>>
>>  Subject: [IANA #249445] Media Type Registration Reviews - Standards Tree/No
>>  Internet  Draft
>>
>>  Reply-To: iana-mime@iana.org
>>
>>  Dear Christian and David,
>>
>>  Per the IESG, IANA has registered the following media type with
>>  David as the point of contact:
>>
>>  application/mp21
>>
>>  Please see
>>
>>  http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/
>>
>>  If you need to update the contact information, please send a
>>  message to iana@iana.org.
>>
>>  Best regards,
>>
>>  Amanda Baber
>>  Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
>>
>>
>>
>>  At 10:34  +0200 8/07/09, erik mannens wrote:
>>
>>  Dear all,
>>
>>  As one of the MPEG-21 editors notified, they did not register any mime-type
>>  for their fragmenting scheme (as we expected). During the next phoneconf
>>  this action can therefore be closed.
>>
>>  Sincere greetings,
>>
>>  Erik
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: myriam [mailto:myriam.amielh@cisra.canon.com.au]
>>  Sent: donderdag 2 juli 2009 1:58
>>  To: erik mannens
>>  Cc: sylvain.devillers@francetelecom.com
>>  Subject: Re: Quick question if MPEG-21 Part 17 got registered on IANA as a
>>  media mime type for fragments
>>
>>  Dear Eric,
>>  no we did not propose any mime type registration.
>>  feel free to contact me again should you have any questions,
>>  Best regards
>>  Myriam
>>
>>  Research Manager
>>  Canon Information System Research Australia
>>
>>  erik mannens wrote:
>>>
>>>  Dear Myriam, Sylvain,
>>>
>>>  As co-chair of W3C's Media Fragments group [1] I ask you as editors of
>>>  MPEG-21 Part 17 if your fragmenting scheme was ever registered as a
>>>  media mime type for fragments on IANA? Thanks in advance for the
>>>  prompt reply and have a nice day.
>>>
>>>  Sincere greetings,
>>>
>>>  Erik Mannens
>>>
>>>  Project Manager
>>>
>>>  Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201
>>>
>>>  B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
>>>
>>>  T: +32 9 331 49 93
>>>
>>>  F: +32 9 331 48 96
>>>
>>>  M: +32 473 27 44 17
>>>
>>>  http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>>>
>>>  [1]: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/
>>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>>  David Singer
>>  Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.


-- 
David Singer
Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 09:49:47 UTC