On 27-Jan-2009, at 23:44 , Yves Lafon wrote:
> For me we should stick to fragments only when the returned content
> would have the same mime type as the original, and another URI for a
> "fragment" (in the video/audio/whatever content meaning of
> "fragment") of the main resource in another mime type. In that case,
> using a Link: header to indicate that it is a sub-part of a bigger
> resource would be the easier way of giving the information to the
> client.
+1.
--
Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma
Goldman