- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:03:24 +0100
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all, Thanks for your inputs Jack, Silvia. Summary: >>> I understand that specifying a time-clipping method, for example in >>> SMIL, is >>> relative to the (timeline of the) resource. Therefore, what's >>> happened if I >>> have: >>> <video clipBegin="5s" clipEnd="15s" >>> src="http://www.example.com/video.mov#t=20,30"/> ? >>> >>> Scenario 3: the clipping method is done relatively to the media >>> fragment but >>> bound to the media fragment, the UA plays the video segment between the >>> seconds 25 (=max[20,20+5]) and 30 (=min[30,20+15]). Silvia + Jack (in case the fragment is used out-of-context): >> From my viewpoint, the URL points to a resource. Thus scenario 3 is >> the correct one, because from a SMIL POV, the clipBegin and clipEnd >> attributes are calculated on the resource. Jack (in case the fragment is used in-context): > In this case I think my answer is: we don't know, and we don't care. If > the video fragment is used in-context it depends on the application what > the best solution is. Do we have a consensus on that? Better phrased: does someone have an objection? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 23:04:14 UTC