- From: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:32:05 +0100
- To: <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Guillaume Olivrin'" <golivrin@meraka.org.za>
Dear Media Fragmenters, Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=16&month=12&year=20 09&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 Guillaume will be our scribe (Silvia, Davy are on deck). Actions opened: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open !!! This is an important call, as we will ask for publication Thursday ... so last chance to discuss things this time !!! Best regards. Erik & Raphaël ------------ AGENDA Teleconference W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2009-12-16 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Wednesday, 16 December *10:00-11:00 UTC* Local time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=16&month=12&year=20 09&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 16 December 2009, 1000 UTC 0200 (West US) 1000 (Galway) 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) 1800 (Shanghai) 1900 (Tokyo) *NEW HOUR* 2100 (Sydney) *NEW HOUR* Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99 Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152 Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") Duration : 60 minutes ------------------------------------------------------------------- IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C IRC Web Client : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chair: Erik ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList Scribe: Guillaume (On Deck: Sylvia) Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by members and invited experts only. 1. ADMIN: * Roll call * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 02 December 2009 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2009/12/02-mediafrag-minutes.html * Next F2F Meeting: see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0024.html * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers (ongoing ... re-raise around 15/01/10) * Charter Extension: when to do what? Other prereqs than publication? 2. SPECIFICATION: 2.0 Publish our work (so far) * Discuss the 2 documents for publication (see Silvia's great work :) ** Go through changes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0050.html http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ ACTION: discuss & get resolution to publish (as is) ** Close actions 123, 124, 125? 2.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves) * Bug in the npt specification found by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html "I'd also like to point out that the ABNF for NPT does not match RFC2326. It allows there to be 0 or more digits following the decimal point, while the MF ABNF allows 1 or more digits." ACTION to take? 2.2 UA Server HTTP Communication: (Conrad/Raphael) * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax * ACTION-124: Silvia to rework section 5 according to Raphael's restructuration plan (see also 2.0) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0022.html * ACTION-125: Michael to revisit his ednote in section 5 2.3 Media Fragment Processing: * Question of MF URI validity by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html 2.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments: * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names? * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html * Silvia's blog post: http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-comp osite-media-resource/ * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics 3.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID': Conrad's proposal (Fragment header): http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments 4. TEST CASES: (Michael) * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ * ACTION-108: Michael to add the missing test cases in corrib * ACTION-115: Michael to come up with categorization of test cases wrt empty, undefined, etc * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/- 20) * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and notifications 5. IMPLEMENTATION: * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could implement the logic on client side * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic could be implemented on client side * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing 6. ISSUES 6.1 Active: None. 6.2 Non-Active: * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at client-side * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases? * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme? * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register the fragment scheme for all media types 7. AOB Erik Mannens
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 12:32:52 UTC