- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:38:59 +0100
- To: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Conrad, Following the ACTION-112 thread on the mailing list [1], and today's telecon [2], I try to summarize the remaining questions and issues we have in order to get a clear picture and converge towards a common solution. As you will read in the minutes of today's telecon, we distinguish two (ideal) cases (ignoring the fallback plans): - case 1: the URI fragment can be resolved directly with the server help and only one roundtrip (HTTP request / HTTP response) takes place - case 2: we introduce a hack so that the URI fragment can be cached in current proxies, two roundtrips take place For the case 1, it seems that your proposal and the current's proposal are similar except that: . you introduce two new headers ('Fragment' and 'Content-Fragment') . your HTTP response is a 200 (and not a 206) and Yves argues that the chances that a cached fragment will be reused and served from the cache is pretty low [3]. *Question:* could you please argue and explain what advantages the introduction of these two new headers bring? For the case 2, both approaches require two round-trips: . Yves argues that we should use a 307 response code for the first roundtrip (instead of a 200) . The current proposal misses the information about the real time range it identifies when the bytes range request is issued. Should we simply fix it by adding 2 Range headers: one in bytes and one in e.g. time:npt? *Question:* is the role of the new headers introduced by Conrad ('Range-Refer' and 'Accept-Range-Refer') similar to the new headers introduced in the current proposal ('Range-Redirect' and 'Accept-Range-Redirect')? Cheers. Raphaël [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0008.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/12/02-mediafrag-minutes.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0014.html -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:39:50 UTC