- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:42:53 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear Silvia, [I suspect Jack has already addressed some of these comments, but I made another run :-)] > Section 6.1 > > * Third paragraph: is missing an "a" in front of "list of name/value pairs" nope, this is plural "... pairS" > * Fourth paragraph: URL should be renamed to URI done (though URL are also URI ;-) > * List of four dimensions: time should be renamed to temporal, space > to spatial and name to named done. > Section 6.2.1 > > * Last paragraph: an "l" is missing at the end of "original" in > "origina media item" done. > Section 6.4, First Editorial Note > > * should the definition of "reasonable" go into the "Side Conditions" > section at the start? > * should the requirement for "a/v sync" go into the "Side Conditions" section? > * embedded timecodes should not be touched, IMHO Good questions ! I think we need to have first some feedback so we can i) better structure this section and ii) see whether indeed we need to complete the side conditions section. > Section 6.4 > > * Third paragraph (not counting the Editorial note): missing a "to" in > "this is up the context" -> "this is up to the context" done. > * Last paragraph: The result of doing spatial clipping on a source > media that has multiple video tracks could be defined if a further > selector only selects one video track. Also, we could define that the > clipping is done on all video tracks the same way if no video track is > selected. I complete the note by: "The result of doing spatial clipping on a source media that has multiple video tracks is undefined if no track selection is applied first." So, generally speaking, it is undefined. We have rejected the idea of clipping on *all* video tracks during the last f2f meeting. Would we like to reopen this discussion? Are there some good cases for doing so? > Section 6.4, Second Editorial Note > > * we should specify that if named addressing is used, all others are ignored I added: "Incompatible: if the named dimension is used, all the other dimensions are ignored." > * we should specify that if multiple temporal or spatial or track > parameters are used, only the first one is interpreted Partially captured by the semantic error #1, slightly rephrased. > * we should specify that any dimensions specified outside the media > resource (e.g. end time after end of file, coordinates outside the > frame) are to be clipped to the actual size of the resource Partially captured by the semantic error #3 in the ed note, but I have completed it. > * we should specify that unknown id or unknown track specifier are to > result in no-op Captured by the semantic error #2 in the ed note. > * we should specify that non-sensical time specs or coordinates (e.g. > t=20,10) result in no-op Captured by the semantic error #4. Thanks for the carreful reading. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 21:43:42 UTC