- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:41:30 +1000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi again :) 2009/4/14 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: > [I suspect Jack has already addressed some of these comments, but I made > another run :-)] Yeah, I would think so, too. > >> Section 6.1 >> >> * Third paragraph: is missing an "a" in front of "list of name/value >> pairs" > > nope, this is plural "... pairS" No, it is "a list" - the list is still singular, it doesn't matter what it consists of. >> * Fourth paragraph: URL should be renamed to URI > > done (though URL are also URI ;-) We should be consistent. >> * Last paragraph: The result of doing spatial clipping on a source >> media that has multiple video tracks could be defined if a further >> selector only selects one video track. Also, we could define that the >> clipping is done on all video tracks the same way if no video track is >> selected. > > I complete the note by: > > "The result of doing spatial clipping on a source media that has multiple > video tracks is undefined if no track selection is applied first." > > So, generally speaking, it is undefined. We have rejected the idea of > clipping on *all* video tracks during the last f2f meeting. Would we like to > reopen this discussion? Are there some good cases for doing so? No, that's fine. I wanted to find out if we have discussed this. I missed the discussion, sorry. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 22:42:22 UTC