W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Feedback on edits to sections 1-5 of WD

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:25:27 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830904130425g405d33f7nae64ed1714bc1c4a@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
2009/4/13 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
> Dear Silvia,
>>> †Erik: i wonder if the individual use cases should be
>>> †ordered differently, following the various dimensions: time, space,
>>> †track, name
>> I was wondering if we should add to section 5 for every requirement
>> which use cases that were listed above it embraces. That would just be
>> a list of numbers from above but will tell us whether we have indeed
>> covered all the use cases that we agreed are within scope. What do
>> people think?
> Yes, I had that in mind too. Ideally, indeed, each UC should refer back to
> req-xxx

Ah, I thought of only a reference in the other direction, but we can do both.

Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 11:26:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:42 UTC