- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:25:27 +1000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
2009/4/13 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: > Dear Silvia, > >>> Erik: i wonder if the individual use cases should be >>> ordered differently, following the various dimensions: time, space, >>> track, name >> >> I was wondering if we should add to section 5 for every requirement >> which use cases that were listed above it embraces. That would just be >> a list of numbers from above but will tell us whether we have indeed >> covered all the use cases that we agreed are within scope. What do >> people think? > > Yes, I had that in mind too. Ideally, indeed, each UC should refer back to > req-xxx Ah, I thought of only a reference in the other direction, but we can do both. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 11:26:18 UTC