Re: Squid experts

Davy, all,

I finally got around to reading the new wiki page.

It's awesome and captures everything we have discussed about
conditions on media formats for enabling the different types of
addressing. Even a table is there!

It actually now turned out to be mostly what we discussed as section
two of the working draft, which was going to go here
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Types_of_Fragment_Addressing
(except for the discussion on which method to use for caching over
http).

Should we merge the two wiki pages? Or just cut and paste the relevant
parts from Davy's page with the working draft one?

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Davy Van Deursen
<davy.vandeursen@ugent.be> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> [snip]
>
>>>I think we are theorizing a lot and are not actually looking at
>>>concrete codecs. We should start getting our hands dirty. ;-) By which
>>>I mean: start classifying the different codecs according to the
>>>criteria that you have listed above and find out for which we are
>>>actually able to do fragments and what types of fragments.
>>
>>I agree, we should create a new page on the wiki starting from this mail
>>and
>>from [2]. I will try to work on that in the next days.
>>
>>[1]
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>>fragment/2008Nov/0032.html
>>[2]
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>>fragment/2008Nov/0003.html
>>
>
> I have created a new wiki page [1] regarding the issues discussed above. It
> also contains a table providing an overview of the features of media formats
> we consider (in the context of fragment axes). Feel free to comment, add, or
> correct ;-).
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/HTTP_Fragment_Caches
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Davy
>
> --
> Davy Van Deursen
>
> Ghent University - IBBT
> Department of Electronics and Information Systems Multimedia Lab
> URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 21:09:27 UTC