- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 20:04:09 +1100
- To: "Media Fragment" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi all, I had a discussion with a squid expert and wanted to share some of the points that were made. First, they asked why we didn't have a squid expert in the group, since this seems to be such a difficult topic to get right. If somebody in the squid community would be interested, would we want them to join? One technical point that was made is that doing time ranges in proxies may be really difficult since time is inherently continuous and so the continuation from e.g. second 5 to second 6 may not easily be storable in a 2-way handshake in the proxy. Instead there was a suggestion to create a codec-independent media resource description format that would be a companion format for media resources and could be downloaded by a Web client before asking for any media content. With that, the Web client would easily be able to construct byte range requests from time range requests and could thus fully control the download. This would also mean that Web proxies would not require any changes. It's an interesting idea and I would want to discuss this in particular with Davy. Can such a format represent all of the following structural elements of a media resource: * time fragments * spatial fragments * tracks * named fragments. Anyway ... some more food for thought! Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 09:04:47 UTC