- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:52:37 +1100
- To: "Daniel Park" <soohongp@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Davy Van Deursen" <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, "Media Fragment" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
It is indeed a legal and business issue - I thought I made that clear in my reply, but obivously didn't. :) Cheers, Silvia. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote: > Well Silvia, It seems to me not a technical issue but sorts of political and > business issues in the market. Recomposition of fragmented pieces can be a > new media to the user, and that can make a new business model. In that > sense, presumably someone who have a copyright of each pieces will claim > their licence for the new media. > > BTW, it is not scope of media-fragments WG though... > > My 0.02 cents, > > > Daniel Park [at] Samsung Electronics > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> * Section 1.4: >> >> >>> - This use case is again for me an application of 1.1, that is >> >> >>> this >> >> >>time >> >> >>> linking for recomposing (making playlist) >> >> >> >> >> >>Recompositing poses very different challenges to an application that >> >> >>just playback. I can see where you come from - for you it is just a >> >> >>piece of content delivered to a user agent and you don't really care >> >> >>what the user agent does with it. However, I am looking at use cases >> >> >>from the user's POV. A user would not regard watching a video as the >> >> >>same use case as editing clips together. I am just weary that we >> >> >> might >> >> >>oversee some things if we throw these use cases together too much. >> >> > >> >> > Note that there is another issue with the recomposition of media >> >> > fragments. >> >> > For instance, consider scenario 3 where video fragments (possibly all >> >> > having >> >> > different parent media resources) are put together. Since different >> >> > parent >> >> > resources implies potentially different underlying media formats, >> >> > things >> >> > become complicated if we expect a smooth playback of a mashup of >> >> > media >> >> > fragments. This is because different underlying media formats require >> >> > the >> >> > (re-)initialization of the decoder(s) during playback of the mashup. >> >> > Therefore, I think we should make clear that in this scenario, we do >> >> > not >> >> > expect smooth transitions between the different media fragments in >> >> > the >> >> > playlist, because otherwise, this use case is far from trivial to >> >> > implement. >> >> >> > >> > I've read this UC&Req. document and looks good to me. Particularly, >> > Section >> > 1.4 is a close related to my research in conjunction with IPTV business. >> > I >> > am saying this UC as *storytelling*. There are lots of widely spreaded >> > pieces on the web, and if we can recomposit them into one media to be >> > palyed >> > on TV screen, that would be good for IPTV viewers since IPTV viewers >> > fully >> > make sense to watch out these long video in their living room. Merging >> > those >> > fragments media allow me to make a entirely new media to IPTV users. If >> > it >> > can play very smoothly, it's also great of course. >> > >> > One concern in my mind is how to deal with copyright of each fragment. >> > If I >> > missed this threads, I am sorry about that...:-) >> >> No you haven't missed anything. Copyright is a legal matter that may >> disallow you from doing what a technology like media fragment URIs >> enables you to do. It is something that has to be dealt with at a >> different level - maybe through metadata attached to the media >> fragments or provided on the original publishing site of the video. >> With the media fragment URI spec at least you can make sure that the >> metadata of a video is not removed or disconnected, since the URI is >> continuing to point to the original data and not to a copy of it that >> may have had copyright information stripped. It is certainly not >> something we should need to deal with in media fragments WG, IMHO. >> >> Best Regards, >> Silvia. >
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 07:53:14 UTC