W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:18:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEQw7Jkvt+r3bpDT3+TbrOEQ78p_P5RWmowgBuL657m+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: WebRTC WG <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
I think NV is an important topic and it makes sense to have a f2f meeting
about it.  I'm inclined to say the more time the better (a half day doesn't
seem like enough).  Two days sounds great, but it seems hard to squeeze two
days into an IETF week(end).

A long time ago, we had f2f interims independent of IETF meetings.  Would
one of those make sense?

I'm fine either way (piggybacking on IETF or not).  My main concern would
be that enough people come that it would be a worthwhile meeting.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:12 AM Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> we'd like to know what people feel about arranging a f2f the weekend
> before IETF 102 in Montreal. (Meaning July 13-14)
> We've heard wishes to discuss how we should get started on NV, and other
> topics (like testing, or getting webrtc-pc to PR, for example) could
> perhaps also be fruitful to discuss.
> So, would this be a good idea? If so, should it be a
> half-day/full-day/two-day meeting? What topics should we focus on?
> All input is welcome!
> Stefan for the chairs
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2018 16:18:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:41 UTC