Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102

I think a 1.5 day meeting on the sat/sun before IETF 102 would make sense. 

I would like to spend a bunch of the time talking about what is the actually functionality we don't have today that we would like to add or improve and whiteboard out ways we might do it. 



> On Mar 14, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
> 
> I think NV is an important topic and it makes sense to have a f2f meeting about it.  I'm inclined to say the more time the better (a half day doesn't seem like enough).  Two days sounds great, but it seems hard to squeeze two days into an IETF week(end).  
> 
> A long time ago, we had f2f interims independent of IETF meetings.  Would one of those make sense?  
> 
> I'm fine either way (piggybacking on IETF or not).  My main concern would be that enough people come that it would be a worthwhile meeting.
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:12 AM Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we'd like to know what people feel about arranging a f2f the weekend
> before IETF 102 in Montreal. (Meaning July 13-14)
> 
> We've heard wishes to discuss how we should get started on NV, and other
> topics (like testing, or getting webrtc-pc to PR, for example) could
> perhaps also be fruitful to discuss.
> 
> So, would this be a good idea? If so, should it be a
> half-day/full-day/two-day meeting? What topics should we focus on?
> 
> All input is welcome!
> 
> Stefan for the chairs
>