On 5/19/15 10:29 AM, Joe Berkovitz wrote: > 2. How would the WG feel about including more "filtered" information > in the MediaDeviceInfos returned by enumerateDevices(), other than the > device label I'm going to take a stab at guessing that the original intent with 'label' was for web-devs to look up the info they care about themselves. E.g. label == " Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920" -> look in table of what I care about scraped from http://wiki.oz9aec.net/index.php/Logitech_HD_Pro_Webcam_C920 I.e. an end-run around workgroups and browsers having to formalize every spec sheet known to humankind. I should say I see evidence this isn't always working so well, e.g. android phones seem to give nonsense labels like "Camera front", and I see a lot of microphones called "Built-in microphone" or "". How about a compromise like 'modelNumber', or maybe come up with better rules for label? Also from a practical standpoint, not every platform is chock full of info here. OSX for example seems surprisingly tight-lipped about its hardware. .: Jan-Ivar :.Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 02:53:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:33 UTC